News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Origin buys Yass Valley wind farm proposal 

Origin buys Yass Valley wind farm proposal

05 Feb, 2010 03:00 AM
Major Australasian power provider Origin Energy has purchased two proposed wind farm precincts in the Yass Valley area.

The takeover of the planned Coppabella Hills and Marilba Hills wind farm precincts from energy provider Epuron indicates Origin is confident of receiving State Government consent for the $1 billion plus project.

If passed, the Coppabella Hills precinct, located 10km southwest of Binalong, may be home to up to 82 turbines on 15 properties.

The Marilba Hills precinct, situated 6km southwest of Bowning, may host as many as 70 turbine towers and involve ten landowners.

Together the two could produce enough energy to power 150,000 homes annually.

The building of turbines may still be six to ten years away despite obvious interest in the region as a clean energy provider. First the project requires the State Government to pass a yet-to-be-finalised development application.

The scheme's go-ahead rests solely with the NSW Department of Planning, an issue that has irked landowners and council; those left with the responsibility of housing the turbines.

"We're here to represent the community... It's a little disappointing in some respects we don't have any direct involvement with the State Government on this matter," Yass Valley Council Director of Planning and Environmental Services, Paul De Szell, said.

"The good thing for us is we're now dealing with one entity that has control of the entire project. It makes it easier for council to deal with landholders and those responsible for the planning of the proposal," he said.

Paul Regan manages a family property near Binalong. He and other landholders have been lobbying the State Government to consider placing restrictions on wind turbine towers.

"We know we're not in a position to stop it, it's out of our hands," he said. "But we're fighting to have some sort of restrictions placed on the turbine towers. They're visible from 90 per cent of my family's property.

"Another major concern, while it hasn't been proven, is how it might affect land values. To be honest, if we did own hills they wanted to put turbines on, I would decline because despite the short term financial gain, the long term effects are too great," he said.

Mr Regan feared in 25 years time, local farmers would be responsible for pulling down the turbines once they cease to serve any purpose.

An Origin Energy spokesperson was adamant legal agreements would be drawn up ensuring the company responsible for erecting the towers would be forced to ensure they were properly disposed of in the future.

David Burraston and Sarah Last reside on a property near Muttama, southeast of Cootamundra. If approved, the Coppabella Hills wind farm will sit in the 50km corridor between their home and Binalong.

In October last year, the couple submitted a document to the New South Wales Government outlining their strong objections to the project.

"It's a totally unnecessarily development. These turbines are apparently put up to cut down on greenhouse gasses, but they have to be backed up by gas-powered stations," Dr Burraston said.

He described the consultation between the energy investors and affected landholders as "appalling".

"The only consultation we've been given was notice that we had 30 days to go over a lengthy document [the environmental assessment], research and write a sensible reply. And 14 of the 30 days had already passed. I'd describe responding to that as bloody impossible," a frustrated Dr Burraston said.

Judy Pinder was a candidate at the 2008 Yass Valley Council election and stood under the Greens Party banner. She believes harnessing the energy created by wind is a positive step.

“At some stage, sooner or later, we’re going to have to bite the bullet and look at ways of becoming more sustainable,” she said. “People object to the idea of having wind turbines next to their property, but they’ve never had to live next to a coal-fired power station. Living next to one of those has far worse implications.”

Ms Pinder would welcome more use of solar created energy.

As well as the Coppabella and Marilba Hills precincts, Origin Energy has ownership of the already approved 15 turbine wind farm at Conroy's Gap, halfway between Bowning and Bookham.

The three precincts cover an area of approximately 7400 hectares [18,300 acres]. Of that, approximately 29 hectares [72 acres] of vegetation and plant-life would need to be cleared, according to an environmental assessment published by firm nghenvironemnt last year.

Origin Energy has indicated it plans to hold information days on the Yass Valley Wind Farm Proposal in the near future.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Notice an Origin spokesman (unnamed) states that the company putting up the towers would be resposnsible to decommission them, they don't indicate that would be Origin energy.
Posted by E Paulding, 5/02/2010 6:32:32 AM, on Yass Tribune
Notice an Origin spokesman (unnamed) states that the company putting up the towers would be resposnsible to decommission them, they don't indicate that would be Origin energy.
Posted by E Paulding, 5/02/2010 6:41:42 AM, on Yass Tribune
Judy Pinder just lost my vote, you need to do some serious research if you think a wind turbine will solve any problems. I can't believe the greens will endorse large multinational companies raking in millions in subsidies, I guess subsidies are a form of socialism so maybe I should have a rethink...


Posted by mick, 5/02/2010 7:12:04 AM, on Yass Tribune
Origin claim the company who puts the towers up will remove them. I highly doubt that. Origin will not put up the towers anyway, they will contract someone else to do it, thus avoiding pulling them down. Who will pull them down? the poor old farmers they have taken for a ride. I cant understand why any farmer would let these carpetbaggers put tax towers on their land, its pushing up power costs for the rest of us, no wonder there is such divisions in the community.
Posted by toby, 5/02/2010 7:17:13 AM, on Yass Tribune
For the benefit of readers the following is the main contents of emails I sent to Lloyd Scroope who wrote this article. I will break these up over a number of posts because of the 1200 character limit. Also the article states we submitted a document to the NSW gov objecting to the project. This statement is incorrect, there were two submissions to the NSW Government Inquiry into Rural Wind Farms in OCt last year. I also submitted to the NSW Dept of Planning objecting to Yass Valley WF as part of the planning process, which is still ongoing, this happened in Dec. For our parliamentary submissions into the ongoing NSW Inquiry into Rural Wind Farms we conducted a significant amount of research, which is ongoing. Link to the submission is here -> http://parliament.nsw.gov.au/Prod /parlment/committee.nsf/0/9EF8402 137A62363CA25762700199733 and link to our supplementary submission is here -> http://parliament.nsw.gov.au/Prod /parlment/committee.nsf/0/CD010AB 5ADF1CE9BCA257664000E86DA The supplementary contains an extensive annotated bibliography, which I highly recommend you look at first.
Posted by DB, 5/02/2010 7:27:58 AM, on Yass Tribune
Here are few of the points that I submitted to the NSW planning office regarding the Yass Valley Environmental Assessment (EA). GHG emissions reduction figures are incorrect (over-estimated by at least 3 times) and no context in terms of percentage of emissions reduction is given. Note carefully where the decimal point is in the following numbers : Yass Valley windfarm will result in "at best" a 0.0005% reduction in Australian GHG emissions, and 0.000014% reduction in global emissions. Figures such as "homes powered" and "car's off the road" are misleading and meaningless figures. To further put that in context Australia gov's GHG reporting figures have an error margin of +/-3%, according to the governments national inventory reporting documents. The total wind farms in the entire landmass of Australia dont even get out of the "noise floor" of that error, so Yass Valley is hardly even a drop in the ocean.
Posted by DB, 5/02/2010 7:30:06 AM, on Yass Tribune
Wind turbine layouts do not follow SEDA planning guidelines of 5r-8r turbine spacing rule, note : r means rotor diameters. This happened at Cullerin (also built by Origin, and setup by Epuron) with the result that noise is a big problem. Noise is also a problem at Capital windfarm at Bungendore. The Dept of Planning know this. Should such a spacing rule be correctly adjusted the number of turbines on a property will be significantly reduced. Wind turbine decommissioning in the proposal assumes that scrap value will cover decommissioning. According to the NSW Inquiry Report this needs urgent attention, and may require a developer bond. The landowners will NOT get scrap value, and if they enter a contract that leaves them in charge of decom, it will cost them >$100k per turbine + a logistical nightmare to organise it. And they will have to organise it, the law requires they be removed within 12 months of ceasing operation.
Posted by DB, 5/02/2010 7:30:53 AM, on Yass Tribune
Impacts to local climate by large scale wind farms were glossed over. Scientific research shows that wind farms significantly slow down the wind at turbine hub-height and create additional turbulence. This leads to effects on local climate such as a warming and drying of the surface air, scientists have called for more research in this area. The windfarm is being proposed right in the middle of critical endangered Box Gum Grassy Woodland, along with its associated endangered species. The negative environmental impacts from such a development are compeltely unacceptable. Community consultation by Epuron has been terrible. Photomontages have been pictured very poorly and not against a clear blue background. All the critical images in the EA relating to turbine layouts and some other aspects are illegible. 30 days exhibition time is ridiculously short, the recent NSW gov Inquiry recommendation is 90 days.
Posted by DB, 5/02/2010 7:31:42 AM, on Yass Tribune
The "Fast Track" process also further makes any meaningful or legitimate objection practically impossible as the decision is turned around in 3 to 4 months. The developer can then sit on the application for up to 3 years, before needing to apply for an extension to the Dept of Planning. e.g. Conroys Gap will have been 3 years by end of May 2010 and not a thing has been done. The Taralga wind farm initially started its monitoring phase over 10 years ago and was approved in Feb 2007, yet 3 years later nothing has been built. So much for the "urgency" of these so-called climate change solutions. The EA itself is methodologically flawed in many areas. The noise report for example is using a well known and widely reported flawed methodology to assess the noise impact. Again the NSW Inquiry Report mentioned this. The noise and visual assessment and the EA itself is further flawed by the incorrect specification of the Vestas V90 turbine height at 35m shorter than it actually is. The effects of noise on health is a well documented issue.
Posted by DB, 5/02/2010 7:32:12 AM, on Yass Tribune
Landscape topography in Yass Valley will contribute to turbulence and noise issues. This is because the hill slopes are all greater than 10 degrees, which violates turbine manufacturer specifications. This invalidates any noise modeling estimates because turbines will be operated outside of their normal tolerances. Water bombing by air in the event of a bush fire will not be possible within the footprint of the wind farm. Wildlife impacts were played down and key research in negative impacts to wildlife species was not referenced in the EA. Windfarms do not provide any energy security or reliability of supply, do not displace any coal fire power stations, and have to be backed up by gas powered fossil fuel power stations. The Australian Energy Regulator is fully aware of this, as can be seen by anyone who cares to read the "State of the Energy Market 2009" report. This is not a made up claim.
Posted by DB, 5/02/2010 7:33:09 AM, on Yass Tribune
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Turbines being erected at Cullerin Range, near Gunning.
Turbines being erected at Cullerin Range, near Gunning.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB43 plans 1%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 5%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 3%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



Yass Tribune







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...